← All Working Groups
Digital Governance Data Privacy Cross-border Regulation AI Policy

Regulation & Policy

Developing adaptive governance frameworks for digital assets, data sovereignty, and cross-border regulatory harmonisation — balancing innovation imperatives with consumer protection and institutional accountability.

Our Mission

Shaping Digital Governance for the 21st Century

The Regulation & Policy Working Group convenes leading legal scholars, senior regulators, and policy advisors to develop adaptive governance frameworks for the digital economy. Our work focuses on bridging the gap between rapidly evolving technology and the institutional frameworks that govern it — producing evidence-based policy recommendations that balance innovation imperatives with consumer protection, data sovereignty, and cross-border regulatory coherence.

As jurisdictions worldwide grapple with overlapping and often contradictory regulatory approaches to digital markets, AI, and data flows, this working group provides the rigorous analysis and multi-stakeholder dialogue needed to identify cooperative pathways. Our research draws on game theory, mechanism design, and comparative legal analysis to illuminate the strategic dynamics shaping global digital governance.

Research Priorities

Current Research Agenda

Our research programme addresses the most pressing governance challenges at the intersection of technology, policy, and international cooperation.

01

AI Governance Frameworks

Developing comparative analyses of AI regulatory approaches across jurisdictions — examining the EU AI Act, US executive orders, and China's tiered classification system — to identify coordination mechanisms that avoid a destructive regulatory race to the bottom.

02

Cross-Border Data Governance

Analysing how unilateral data localisation policies create a Nash equilibrium that suppresses global digital trade, and proposing cooperative frameworks built on mutual recognition and adequacy agreements.

03

Platform Governance & Digital Markets

Examining how network effects and market tipping create natural monopolies in digital markets, and evaluating regulatory instruments — from the EU Digital Markets Act to Japan's TFDPA — through the lens of two-sided market theory.

04

Digital Rights & Algorithmic Accountability

Investigating accountability frameworks for public-sector AI deployment in welfare, immigration, and criminal justice — addressing the fairness-accuracy trade-off and the impossibility of simultaneous algorithmic fairness criteria.

Publications

Related Insights

Recent research and analysis from this working group.

The Nash Equilibrium of Cross-Border Data Governance
Working Paper February 2026

The Nash Equilibrium of Cross-Border Data Governance

A game-theoretic analysis of how nations' individually rational data sovereignty policies create a collective action problem that suppresses global digital trade by an estimated 15–25%.

The AI Governance Trilemma: Innovation, Safety, and Global Competitiveness
Working Paper February 2026

The AI Governance Trilemma: Innovation, Safety, and Global Competitiveness

A game-theoretic analysis of the impossible triangle facing regulators as the US, EU, and China compete to shape the global AI governance landscape through divergent regulatory strategies.

Generative AI and Intellectual Property Governance
Working Paper February 2026

Generative AI and Intellectual Property Governance

The tension between AI training on copyrighted data, fair use doctrines across jurisdictions, and the economic implications for creative industries valued at $2.6 trillion globally.

Digital Health Data Governance Frameworks
Policy Brief January 2026

Digital Health Data Governance Frameworks

Cross-border health data flows, genomic data sovereignty, and WHO frameworks — analysing the tension between pandemic preparedness and privacy through public goods theory.

Platform Governance and Digital Markets Regulation
Policy Brief November 2025

Platform Governance and Digital Markets Regulation

Digital platform concentration is striking and persistent. This analysis examines the DMA, US antitrust, and Japan's TFDPA through the lens of two-sided market theory and regulatory competition.

Mechanism Design for Global Carbon Credit Markets
Policy Brief November 2025

Mechanism Design for Global Carbon Credit Markets

Voluntary carbon markets face a credibility crisis. We apply Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism design to propose market structures that align individual incentives with climate outcomes.

Join This Working Group

We welcome applications from scholars, policymakers, and senior practitioners with expertise in digital governance, data protection, and regulatory harmonisation.

Apply to join